• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • NEWS+OPINIONS
    • NEWS TO US
    • COLUMNS
      • APPARENT HORIZON
      • DEAR READER
      • Close
    • LONGFORM FEATURES
    • OPINIONS
    • EDITORIAL
    • Close
  • ARTS+ENTERTAINMENT
    • FILM
    • MUSIC
    • COMEDY
    • PERFORMING ARTS
    • VISUAL ARTS
    • Close
  • DINING+DRINKING
    • EATS
    • SIPS
    • BOSTON BETTER BEER BUREAU
    • Close
  • LIFESTYLE
    • CANNABIS
      • TALKING JOINTS MEMO
      • Close
    • WELLNESS
    • GTFO
    • Close
  • STUFF TO DO
  • TICKETS
  • ABOUT US
    • ABOUT
    • MASTHEAD
    • ADVERTISE
    • Close

Dig Bos

The Dig - Greater Boston's Alternative News Source

NATIONAL WIRE: SUPREME COURT TO CONSIDER HEARING DACA APPEAL

Written by ANDREA SEARS Posted February 14, 2018 Filed Under: News, NEWS+OPINIONS

 

The US Supreme Court may decide Friday if it will hear oral arguments in the government’s appeal of a federal court’s order for a nationwide halt to the Trump administration’s termination of the Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals program known as DACA.

 

A federal district court in Northern California issued the nationwide preliminary injunction in January. It said the repeal of the program that allows undocumented immigrants who arrived as children to work and attend school without fear of deportation was illegal.

 

In a rare move, the Trump administration has sought to appeal that decision directly to the Supreme Court.

 

According to Trudy Rebert, an attorney with the National Immigration Law Center, the high court will be holding a conference on the case this Friday.

 

“We don’t know if they will decide whether they will take it then, but they may,” Rebert explains. “They ordered the briefing on an expedited basis so that they could decide whether they wanted to take it up.”

 

On Tuesday a New York Court also ordered a halt to the termination of DACA. The Trump administration argues that its repeal of DACA is legal.

 

The New York case was brought by six so-called Dreamers who maintain that the termination of the program is a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act and the Fifth Amendment.

 

Rebert says Tuesday’s ruling means the court believes the plaintiffs are likely to win their case.

 

“It yet again affirms that the government’s decision to terminate DACA was unlawful,” she states. “It also reinforces the need for Congress to pass a Dream Act and a permanent solution for folks with DACA.”

 

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has called President Barack Obama’s implementation of DACA by executive order an unconstitutional exercise of executive authority.

 

The injunctions mean that the government must allow about 800,000 DACA recipients to apply to renew their status. And Rebert points out that the impact goes far beyond the DACA recipients themselves.

 

“It also affects their employers and schools where people have extended offers of admission and allowed people credits and things on the basis that people had been planning their lives around DACA,” she points out.

 

Following Tuesday’s ruling the Justice Department said it is looking forward to the next stage of litigation in the case.

ANDREA SEARS
+ posts
    This author does not have any more posts.

Filed Under: News, NEWS+OPINIONS Tagged With: DACA, Dreamers, immigration, US Supreme Court

WHAT’S NEW

Massachusetts Bill, Victim Advocates Call For Coordinated Date-Rape Drug Response

Massachusetts Bill, Victim Advocates Call For Coordinated Date-Rape Drug Response

Report: Fewer Youth Transition Out Of Massachusetts Foster Care System

Report: Fewer Youth Transition Out Of Massachusetts Foster Care System

State Wire: Activists Urge Congress To Raise Debt Ceiling, Resist Spending Cuts

State Wire: Activists Urge Congress To Raise Debt Ceiling, Resist Spending Cuts

Dancing On Banana Peels: Life On Lifetime Parole In Massachusetts

Dancing On Banana Peels: Life On Lifetime Parole In Massachusetts

Justice Department Completes Vetting Of Rachael Rollins

Justice Department Completes Vetting Of Rachael Rollins

AG Investigating BPD To Determine If “Gang Unit” Engages In “Unconstitutional Policing”

AG Investigating BPD To Determine If “Gang Unit” Engages In “Unconstitutional Policing”

Primary Sidebar

LOCAL EVENTS

AAN Wire


Most Popular

  • AG Investigating BPD To Determine If “Gang Unit” Engages In “Unconstitutional Policing”
  • Over Yondr: Are Cell Phone Pouches At Shows Liberating, Dangerous, Or Annoying?
  • Deep Cuts Brings Sandwiches, Craft Beer, And Live Music To Medford
  • Family Of Woman Killed By Commuter Rail Sues MBTA For Crash Records
  • Daring Greatly: TikTok Star Alden McWayne (aka Gucci Pineapple) On Scheming And Dreaming

Footer

Social Buttons

DigBoston facebook DigBoston Twitter DigBoston Instagram

Masthead

About

Advertise

Customer Service

About Us

DigBoston is a one-stop nexus for everything worth doing or knowing in the Boston area. It's an alt-weekly, it's a website, it's an email blast, it's a twitter account, it's that cool party that you were at last night ... hey, you're reading it, so it's gotta be good. For advertising inquiries: sales@digboston.com To reach editorial (and for inquiries about internship opportunities): editorial@digboston.com